Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Animal-human relations: fighting cocks and their professional cock-feeders in England in the long eighteenth century: the secret world of cockfight preparation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For much of the sporting past, animal-human relationships have been central to many of England’s more popular sports, often encouraging sociability, gambling, and commercialisation. Yet historians of sport are yet to fully initiate studies of animal-human inter-relationships. Cockfighting provides just one example. It was a leading sport in England from the seventeenth to the early nineteenth century. For its more professionalised and commercialized cock-match mains, expert ‘cock-feeders’ were employed to train, feed and prepare gamecocks for combat. Most were publicly available, hiring out their specialized knowledge, skills and expertise. The social origins, careers, and the skills and expertise of the profession, the complexities of the work done by feeders with their charges, and how it changed over time, in terms of exercise and sparring regimens, the length of training, the nature of cock diets, and weight reduction techniques, serves as a strong reminder that cock-feeders and the gamecocks both had agency, and that relationships between gamecocks and humans were two-way affairs, as the birds responded to their feeders and the feeders to their charges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-393
Number of pages20
JournalThe International Journal of the History of Sport
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date7 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2026

Keywords

  • cockfighting
  • professionalisation of sport
  • eighteenth-century sport
  • cock-feeders
  • animal-human studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Animal-human relations: fighting cocks and their professional cock-feeders in England in the long eighteenth century: the secret world of cockfight preparation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this