Abstract
There is a wealth of research that details the bidirectional nature of the majority of intimate partner violence (IPV; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Misra, Selwyn & Rohling, 2012). However, there is a tendency for interventions to treat perpetrators and victims unilaterally from a gendered standpoint. The current paper discusses the evidence to date that illustrates the extent of the problem including frequency within several samples, and the severity of outcomes. It further argues that the only way to develop effective interventions is to acknowledge that many perpetrators may also be victims, and the need to understand the context in which the violence occurs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 937-940 |
| Journal | Journal of Family Violence |
| Volume | 31 |
| Early online date | 5 Sept 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Current controversies within intimate partner violence: overlooking bidirectional violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver