Environmental consequences of interacting effects of changes in stratospheric ozone, ultraviolet radiation, and climate: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2024

  • Patrick Neale
  • , Samuel Hylander
  • , Anastazia Banaszak
  • , Donat-P. Häder
  • , Kevin Rose
  • , Davide Vione
  • , Sten-Åke Wängberg
  • , Marcel Jansen
  • , Rosa Busquets
  • , Mads P. Sulbæk Andersen
  • , Sasha Madronich
  • , Mark Hanson
  • , Tamara Schikowski
  • , Keith Solomon
  • , Barbara Sulzberger
  • , Timothy Wallington
  • , Anu Heikkilä
  • , Krishna Pandey
  • , Anthony Andrady
  • , Laura Bruckman
  • Christopher White, Liping Zhu, Germar Bernhard, Alkiviadis Bais, Pieter Aucamp, Gabriel Chiodo, Raúl Cordero, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Rachel Neale, Catherine Olsen, Simon Hales, Aparna Lal, Gareth Lingham, Lesley Rhodes, Antony Young, Matthew Robson, Sharon Robinson, Paul Barnes, Janet Bornman, Anna Harper, Hanna Lee, Roy Mackenzie Calderón, Rachele Ossola, Nigel Paul, Laura Revell, Qing-Wei Wang, Richard Zepp

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

This Assessment Update by the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) addresses the interacting effects of changes in stratospheric ozone, solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and climate on the environment and human health. These include new modelling studies that confirm the benefits of the Montreal Protocol in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer and its role in maintaining a stable climate, both at low and high latitudes. We also provide an update on projected levels of solar UV-radiation during the twenty-first century. Potential environmental consequences of climate intervention scenarios are also briefly discussed, illustrating the large uncertainties of, for example, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI). Modelling studies predict that, although SAI would cool the Earth’s surface, other climate factors would be affected, including stratospheric ozone depletion and precipitation patterns. The contribution to global warming of replacements for ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are assessed. With respect to the breakdown products of chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol, the risks to ecosystem and human health from the formation of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as a degradation product of ODS replacements are currently de minimis. UV-radiation and climate change continue to have complex interactive effects on the environment due largely to human activities. UV-radiation, other weathering factors, and microbial action contribute significantly to the breakdown of plastic waste in the environment, and in affecting transport, fate, and toxicity of the plastics in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and the atmosphere. Sustainability demands continue to drive industry innovations to mitigate environmental consequences of the use and disposal of plastic and plastic-containing materials. Terrestrial ecosystems in alpine and polar environments are increasingly being exposed to enhanced UV-radiation due to earlier seasonal snow and ice melt because of climate warming and extended periods of ozone depletion. Solar radiation, including UV-radiation, also contributes to the decomposition of dead plant material, which affects nutrient cycling, carbon storage, emission of greenhouse gases, and soil fertility. In aquatic ecosystems, loss of ice cover is increasing the area of polar oceans exposed to UV-radiation with possible negative effects on phytoplankton productivity. However, modelling studies of Arctic Ocean circulation suggests that phytoplankton are circulating to progressively deeper ocean layers with less UV irradiation. Human health is also modified by climate change and behaviour patterns, resulting in changes in exposure to UV-radiation with harmful or beneficial effects depending on conditions and skin type. For example, incidence of melanoma has been associated with increased air temperature, which affects time spent outdoors and thus exposure to UV-radiation. Overall, implementation of the Montreal Protocol and its Amendments has mitigated the deleterious effects of high levels of UV-radiation and global warming for both environmental and human health.

This article has been updated.
Change history:
08 May 2025: A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-025-00731-w
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-392
Number of pages36
JournalPhotochemical and Photobiological Sciences
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date17 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Air-pollution
  • Atmospheric fate
  • Depletion
  • Dna-damage
  • Exposure
  • Impact
  • Springtime arctic ozone
  • Sulfur injections
  • System models
  • Trifluoroacetic-acid

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental consequences of interacting effects of changes in stratospheric ozone, ultraviolet radiation, and climate: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2024'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this