How many ways are there to measure a tree? - An experiment in cross-disciplinarity

  • Kate Pahl
  • , Samyia Ambreen
  • , Khawla Badwan
  • , Simon Carr
  • , David Cooper
  • , Elizabeth Curtis
  • , Ian Davenport
  • , Abigail Hackett
  • , Peter Kraftl
  • , Peter Lawrence
  • , Emily Lines
  • , David Cường Nguyễn
  • , Caitlin Nunn
  • , Steve Pool
  • , Jennifer Rowntree
  • , Ed Schofield
  • , Johan Siebers
  • , Jo Vergunst

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article takes a transdisciplinary approach to a relatively simple-sounding task – tree measuring. It asks the question, ‘How many ways are there to measure a tree?’, in order to provoke a discussion of our different ways of knowing. It attempts to engage a reader in thinking about disciplines and what they do. It does so by sharing insights from a project in which diverse scholars, practitioners and children came together for the common purpose of producing engaged knowledge. The experience of reading the article should prompt questions about whose knowledge counts and why, and the value of university research that is engaged and grounded. We conclude with a question of what kinds of measurements matter and why. The article takes the reader through different disciplinary perspectives, from science to social science to poetry, and, in that process, engages with the ‘how’ of disciplines in terms of real-world problems.
Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch for All
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date31 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 31 Mar 2025

Keywords

  • trees
  • science
  • social science
  • engaged research
  • climate change
  • co-production
  • children and young people
  • art practice
  • geography
  • philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How many ways are there to measure a tree? - An experiment in cross-disciplinarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this