Abstract
An ongoing oral history project at the University of Cumbria seeks to uncover the lived experiences of people with learning difficulties who lived at the Royal Albert Hospital. A recently made video exposed the apparent distress this caused one of the participants. Ethical discussions about the project reached a point of being ‘stuck’. The ethical dilemma was presented at the Collaborative Action Research Network conference in 2009, and the ensuing discussion with conference participants produced a rich, collaborative unpicking of the issues. Problems of power, multiple discourse, historical relationships and ethical fluidity emerged. Analysis of the praxis of the project – that is, ways of thinking, doing and saying – suggests different ways of progressing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 497-513 |
| Journal | Educational Action Research |
| Volume | 20 |
| Early online date | 29 Nov 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 29 Nov 2012 |
Keywords
- choice
- collaboration
- ethics
- oral history
- power
- praxis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'It gets me upset talking about the Royal Albert: collaborative analysis of the ethics of an oral history project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver