Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the work is to determine the optimum ambient lighting conditions for viewing softcopy radiological images on LCD.
Materials and Methods: The study measured the diagnostic performance of observers viewing images on liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor under different ambient lighting conditions: 480, 100, 40, 25 and 7lux. An ROC analysis was performed as a measure of diagnostic performance. A set of 30 postero-anterior wrist images was used, 15 of which had fractures present the remainder were normal. These were evaluated by 79 American Board of Radiology certified experienced Radiologists.
Results: The observers performed better at 40 and 25lux compared with 480 and 100 lux. At 7lux, the observers' performance was generally similar to that at 480 and 100lux.
Conclusion: Using the previously recommended ambient lighting levels of 100lux resulted in no improvement over typical office lighting of 480lux. Lower ambient lighting levels ranging from 40-25lux improves diagnostic performance over higher levels. Lowering ambient lighting to 7lux (almost complete darkness apart from the light emanating from the monitor) reduces diagnostic performance to a level equal to that of typical office lighting. It is clearly important to control ambient lighting to ensure that diagnostic performance is maximized.
Materials and Methods: The study measured the diagnostic performance of observers viewing images on liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor under different ambient lighting conditions: 480, 100, 40, 25 and 7lux. An ROC analysis was performed as a measure of diagnostic performance. A set of 30 postero-anterior wrist images was used, 15 of which had fractures present the remainder were normal. These were evaluated by 79 American Board of Radiology certified experienced Radiologists.
Results: The observers performed better at 40 and 25lux compared with 480 and 100 lux. At 7lux, the observers' performance was generally similar to that at 480 and 100lux.
Conclusion: Using the previously recommended ambient lighting levels of 100lux resulted in no improvement over typical office lighting of 480lux. Lower ambient lighting levels ranging from 40-25lux improves diagnostic performance over higher levels. Lowering ambient lighting to 7lux (almost complete darkness apart from the light emanating from the monitor) reduces diagnostic performance to a level equal to that of typical office lighting. It is clearly important to control ambient lighting to ensure that diagnostic performance is maximized.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proc. SPIE 6146, Medical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 61460W |
| Editors | Y Jiang |
| Publisher | SPIE-INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Volume | 6146 |
| ISBN (Print) | 0-8194-6425-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Mar 2006 |
| Event | Medical Imaging 2006 Conference - San Diego, Canada Duration: 12 Feb 2006 → 14 Feb 2006 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceedings Of Spie |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | Medical Imaging 2006 Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | San Diego |
| Period | 12/02/06 → 14/02/06 |
Keywords
- PACs
- Roc
- TeleRadiology
- Ambient lighting
- Diagnostic-performance
- Optimized-displays
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimum ambient lighting conditions for the viewing of softcopy radiological images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver