Abstract
This paper outlines an alternative approach to curriculum design in higher education focusing in particular on the introduction of personal growth into the programme, and on facilitating the selection by students of the optimal choice of options. It is argued that models of curriculum design need to take cognizance of at least four interested parties; and that in the resolutions of their divergent interests, curriculum designers must make clear their most potent values, as well as their theories and assumptions about the nature of learning. A brief outline follows of two courses based upon these propositions. Finally, evaluations by both trainers and students involved in these courses are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Journal | British Journal of Guidance and Counselling |
| Volume | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 16 Oct 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Putting personal growth into an occupational psychology curriculum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver