Response to Scheel et al.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

Abstract

Scheel et al.[1] highlight three types of methodological concern with the work reported in our recent paper [2], related to analytical decisions, fetal behavior, and how light interfaces with maternal tissue. Here we outline why the issues raised do not detract from our originally reported conclusions. In our view, the procedural and analytical decisions that we made in our study [2] were the most appropriate given the uncharted territory that we explored. The best test of methodological robustness of our approach would be replication by another laboratory. [1] A.M. Scheel, S.J. Ritchie, N.J.L. Brown, S.L. Jacques, Methodological problems in a study of fetal visual perception, Curr. Biol., 28 (2018), pp. R594-R596. [2] V.M. Reid, K. Dunn, R.J. Young, J. Amu, T. Donovan, N. Reissland, The human fetus preferentially engages with face-like visual stimuli, Curr. Biol., 27 (2017), pp. 1825-1828.e3.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)R596-R597
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 21 May 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Scheel et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this