Validity and reliability of the Myotest Pro wireless accelerometer in squat jumps

  • Theodoros Bampouras
  • , Nicola Relph
  • , Joseph Esformes
  • , Duncan Orme

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Portable and cost-effective accelerometers can yield instantaneous results of force, power, and velocity, with minimum set-up time to assess muscle power. However, such devices must also produce both valid and reliable data. Objective: The current study assessed the validity and reliability of the Myotest Pro wireless accelerometer (ACC). Methods: Thirty physically active males performed two squat jump, on two separate sessions. The jump was recorded simultaneously by a force platform and ACC, which was attached to a barbell resting on the subjects' shoulders. Validity was determined using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and t-test between the maximum force platform (F_{FP}) and ACC (F_{ACC}) force. Between session reliability of F_{ACC}, power (P_{ACC}) and velocity (V_{ACC}) from the ACC were assessed with t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation (CV). Results: F_{ACC} correlated highly to F_{FP} (r=0.815, p< 0.05), but there was a proportionate ratio bias of 0.81. There was no difference between sessions (p> 0.05) for any variable. High ICCs were found for all variables (F_{ACC} 0.90; P_{ACC} 0.80; V_{ACC} 0.84). Low CV was found for F_{ACC} (2.1%), P_{ACC} (3.3%) and V_{ACC} (3.2%). Conclusions: ACC is a valid and reliable tool to use for assessing barbell movement, but caution in power data interpretation is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-105
JournalIsokinetics and Exercise Science
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • field measurement
  • muscle performance
  • power assessment
  • power production
  • test-retest design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and reliability of the Myotest Pro wireless accelerometer in squat jumps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this